House inaction amid shutdown helps pave the way for Congress’ irrelevance

Various Americans will be voting on Balloting Day or have already cast votes in races for statewide office local positions and on ballot initiatives with major implications for democracy Congress is not on the ballot this November but it will be in the midterms A year from now Americans in every state and district will get to vote for whom they want representing their interests in Washington But right now Congress isn t giving the American people much to go on As the shutdown of the federal ruling body passes the one-month mark the U S House of Representatives has been in recess for over days That s the longest it s ever stayed out of town outside of its typical summer recesses or the weeks leading up to their own elections Notably the shutdown does not mean that Congress can t meet In fact it must meet to end the shutdown legislatively The Senate for example has taken votes of late on judicial nominations a major defense authorization bill and a resolution on tariff program Senators have also continued to hold bipartisan behind-the-scenes negotiations to end the shutdown impasse But with dwindling SNAP benefits skyrocketing robustness care premiums and other major shutdown impacts beginning to set in the House has all but abdicated its position as The People s Chamber Long path to irrelevance In addition to not meeting for any votes Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has refused to swear in Democratic U S Rep -elect Adelita Grijalva of Arizona Despite Johnson s assurances the shutdown does not prevent the House from meeting in a brief session to swear in Grijalva as a member for Arizona s th District which has been without representation since March Along with Casey Burgat and SoRelle Wyckoff Gaynor I am co-author of a textbook Congress Explained Representation and Lawmaking in the First Branch In that book it was crucial to us to highlight Congress clear role as the preeminent lawmaking body in the federal regime But throughout the shutdown battle Congress particularly the House of Representatives has been unwilling to assert itself as an equal branch of leadership Beyond policymaking Congress has been content to hand over plenty of of its core constitutional powers to the executive branch As a Congress expert who loves the institution and profoundly respects its constitutionally mandated role I have revealed this renunciation of responsibility formidable to watch And yet Congress path to irrelevance as a body of leadership did not begin during the shutdown or even in January It is the aftermath of decades of erosion that created a political heritage in which Congress the first branch of establishment listed in the Constitution is relegated to second-class status President Donald Trump holds one of the various executive orders he has signed during his second term Alex Wroblewski AFP via Getty Images The Constitution puts Congress first The th-century framers of the Constitution viewed Congress as the foundation of republican governance deliberately placing it first in Article to underscore its primacy Congress was assigned the pivotal tasks of lawmaking and budgeting because controlling establishment finances was seen as essential to limiting executive power and preventing abuses that the framers associated with monarchy Alternatively a weak legislature and an imperial executive were precisely what a great number of of the founders feared With legislative authority in the hands of Congress power would at least be decentralized among a wide variety of elected leaders from different parts of the country each of whom would jealously guard their own local interests But Trump s first days turned the founders original vision on its head leaving the first branch to play second fiddle Like preponderance contemporary presidents Trump came in with his party in control of the presidency the House and the Senate Yet despite the lawmaking power that this governing trifecta can bring the Republican majorities in Congress have mostly been irrelevant to Trump s agenda Instead Congress has relied on Trump and the executive branch to make changes to federal program and in a great number of cases to reshape the federal establishment altogether Trump has signed more than executive orders a pace faster than any president since Franklin D Roosevelt The Republican Congress has shown little interest in pushing back on any of them Trump has also aggressively reorganized defunded or just deleted entire agencies such as the U S Agency for International Growth and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau These actions have been carried out even though Congress has a clear constitutional authority over the executive branch s budget And during the shutdown Congress has shown little to no interest in reasserting its power of the purse content instead to let the president decide which individuals and agencies receive funding regardless of what Congress has prescribed Several causes no easy solutions There s no one culprit but instead a collection of factors that have provided the ineffectual Congress of in the modern day One overriding factor is a process that has unfolded over the past or more years called political nationalization American politics have become increasingly centered on national issues parties and figures rather than more local concerns or individuals This shift has elevated the importance of the president as the symbolic and practical leader of a national party agenda Simultaneously it weakens the role of individual members of Congress who are now more likely to toe the party line than represent local interests U S Rep -elect Adelita Grijalva an Arizona Democrat who won a special polling on Sept has not been sworn in by House Speaker Mike Johnson Bill Clark CQ-Roll Call Inc via Getty Images As a impact voters focus more on presidential elections and less on congressional ones granting the president greater influence and diminishing Congress independent authority The more Congress polarizes among its members on a party-line basis the less the community is likely to trust the legitimacy of its opposition to a president Instead congressional pushback sometimes as extreme as impeachment can thus be written off not as principled or substantive but as partisan or politically motivated to a greater extent than ever before Congress has also been complicit in giving away its own power Especially when dealing with a polarized Congress presidents increasingly steer the ship in budget negotiations which can lead to more local priorities the ones Congress is supposed to represent being ignored But rather than Congress staking out positions for itself as it often did through the turn of the st century political science research has shown that presidential positions on domestic procedures increasingly dictate and polarize Congress own positions on program that hasn t traditionally been divisive such as funding encouragement for NASA Congress positions on procedural issues such as raising the debt ceiling or eliminating the filibuster also increasingly depend not on bedrock principles but on who occupies the White House In the realm of foreign protocol Congress has all but abandoned its constitutional power to declare war settling instead for authorizations of military force that the president wants to assert These give the commander in chief wide latitude over war powers and both Democratic and Republican presidents have been happy to retain that power They have used these congressional approvals to engage in extended conflicts such as the Gulf War in the early s and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan a decade later What s lost with a weak Congress Americans lose a lot when Congress hands over such drastic power to the executive branch When individual members of Congress from across the country take a back seat their districts distinctly local problems are less likely to be addressed with the power and tools that Congress can bring to an issue Significant local perspectives on national issues fail to be represented in Congress Even members of the same political party represent districts with vastly different economies demographics and geography Members are supposed to keep this in mind when legislating on these issues but presidential control over the process makes that formidable or even impossible Maybe more importantly a weak Congress paired with what historian Arthur Schlesinger called the Imperial Presidency is a recipe for an unaccountable president running wild without the constitutionally provided oversight and checks on power that the founders provided to the people through their representation by the first branch of cabinet This is an updated version of a story that first published on May Charlie Hunt Associate Professor of Political Science Boise State University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license Read the original article The post House inaction amid shutdown helps pave the way for Congress irrelevance appeared first on Salon com